A Deontological Justification for Pursuing the Mitigation of Existential Risks

Authors: Jacob Bowden and Mia Shaw

Summary: The authors argue that while existential risk mitigation is typically approached from a consequentialist viewpoint—focusing on actions that produce the greatest good for future generations—a deontological perspective can equally justify such efforts. Deontology, which bases the morality of actions on adherence to rules and duties rather than outcomes, can still accommodate ethical considerations for future generations. The author explores how deontological principles, such as fairness, inherent worth, and intergenerational justice, can motivate the mitigation of existential risks, even if this means fulfilling less personally gratifying roles. By drawing parallels with moral dilemmas like Peter Singer's drowning child scenario, the paper argues that deontologists may feel an obligation to prevent significant future harm at a minimal personal cost. Thus, the deontological framework provides a robust moral foundation for dedicating efforts to existential risk mitigation, advocating that preventing potential catastrophic outcomes aligns with fundamental moral duties.

Link to PDF version.